Equitable Climate Resilience (ECR) for Local Governments: Using Data to Drive Decision Making

July 11, 2023

Share this article:

 
The Institute for Building Technology and Safety (IBTS) recently completed a two-year study, funded by The Kresge Foundation, focused on helping local governments understand and address social equity in their climate resilience planning efforts. The first phase of the study, conducted in partnership with the National League of Cities (NLC) and National Forum for Black Public Administrators (NFBPA), included robust research of city challenges, successes, and unmet needs when addressing equity in climate resilience. The second phase used results from this research to develop and pilot an assessment tool to assist local governments with evaluating, measuring, and tracking their equitable climate resilience (ECR) efforts. This is the first in a series of blog posts that present study findings and top recommendations for cities interested in advancing equity in their climate resilience efforts. For more information,
read the whitepaper. 

 

Many local governments recognize the need for improving equitable outcomes in their climate resilience efforts. Numerous studies have demonstrated the connection between social vulnerability and negative impacts from extreme weather and natural disasters including much higher rates of mortality, injury, illness, job loss, and displacement, as well as weakened community connections and social well-being among underserved populations. 

 

 Yet addressing these inequities is a complicated and often a confounding challenge for local governments. In addition to competing priorities and limited budgets and resources, our study of 200 city respondents found that many are unsure where to begin. Barriers to undertaking equitable climate resilience (ECR) activities include funding, lack of understanding, and lack of buy-in from leadership. 

 

 Our study determined five components of ECR at the local government level that are crucial for advancing equity in climate resilience efforts: 

 

  1. Data utilization 
  2. Communication 
  3. Stakeholder engagement 
  4. Organizational capacity 
  5. Funding and finance 

 

Among these, data utilization often serves as a useful starting point. “We usually start an ECR conversation with a community by asking about their data – both what data they have and how they are using it” says Patrick Howell, IBTS project manager, who oversees the organization’s ECR work. “It’s important to find out how much they actually know about vulnerable populations, climate hazards and risks, and the intersection between the two.” 

 

 Ideally, a local government will have access to several data sources including census data, demographics, economic data, public health, housing availability, trends, pricing, and evictions, natural hazards, climate risk data, as well as what areas are in the floodplain or at risk for wildfires. “In addition to these external sources, don’t discount internal data,” says Howell, who explains that jurisdictions can use information such as budget trends, cost benefit analyses of programs and policies, and results from equity audits to bolster ECR planning. Granularity is important as well. “Having a detailed understanding of how specific vulnerabilities and risks shift, sometimes significantly, from one neighborhood to the next will be a big help in your ability to prioritize and plan,” says Howell.   

 

Realistically, many local jurisdictions do not have the resources to obtain this level of data, or they may lack agreement about what—if any—additional studies are needed. “You don’t need to have everything to get started or make progress in your ECR efforts,” says Howell, who recommends that local governments take advantage of data provided at no cost by national agencies and organizations. “These resources are available for anyone to use and can give you a much better understanding of your jurisdiction’s climate and social vulnerabilities, disasters, and demographics,” he adds. These include: 

 


  • Climate Mapping for Resilience and Adaptation offers a mapping tool with hazard risk and social vulnerability at the county level (https://resilience.climate.gov/); 

 

  • The Social Vulnerability Index, provided by The Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC/ATSDR) includes mapped data at the county level (https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/interactive_map.html); 

 

  • Robert Wood Johnson County Health Rankings includes all counties in the United States. (https://www.countyhealthrankings.org) 

 

  • National Association of Counties (NACo)–County Explorer tool (https://ce.naco.org/). The tool compiles several data sources into one single platform including: 
  • Demographics 
  • Energy and Environment 
  • Justice and Public Safety 
  • Housing and Community Development 
  • Health and Human Services 

 

  • National Equity Atlas is a comprehensive website that provides detailed reports on racial and economic equity among cities and towns (https://nationalequityatlas.org/). 

 

  • The Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool was developed as a result of the Federal Government’s Justice40 Initiative . It contains an interactive map with data and indicators of burdens across eight categories: climate change, energy, health, housing, pollution, transportation, water, and workforce development, transportation, water, and workforce development. (https://screeningtool.geoplatform.gov/en/#3/33.47/-97.5) 

 

Additionally, local nonprofits, faith-based, and community organizations may have additional data and insights about the communities they serve that they can share. Establishing rapport with these organizations can also benefit numerous other ECR activities. “For example, you may want to conduct a community meeting with residents to better understand their awareness about what to do in a disaster or potential barriers to evacuation,” says Karen Johnson, IBTS’ Market Engagement Program Director, who led the research team for the study. “Local organizations can help connect you with the residents you want to reach and encourage them to participate. You’ll save yourself a lot of time and energy and get better input.” There is also the Community Economic Development Studies (CEDS), which is required by local governments; this study contains a wealth of information.   

 

Once you have the data, it is just as important to identify how you will analyze, understand, use, and share it. “It’s not uncommon for an organization to have raw data that no one is really using, or is really even sure how to use,” says Johnson. “Or you may have silos, where one department is using data but has not shared it with other departments that could also benefit from it. It is easy to miss opportunities to leverage the data you already have, especially in local governments that are understaffed or under-resourced” A solution would be to have a principal place where all data is stored or uploaded, like a file server or SharePoint. 


In many cases, the most difficult part for a jurisdiction is getting buy-in from stakeholders and residents. It is necessary to be transparent about why you are collecting the data, what the goals are, and how it can impact residents. Residents need to learn about climate risks and how to plan for disasters. Providing maps and data visualizations to them can help mitigate potential issues should a disaster happen. Consider a portal for residents to utilize to find information quickly about their residential areas, what impacts them, and some resources available for immediate needs.

 

Another important consideration is budgeting. Use data to drive decision making and make sure that ECR is a part of the budgeting process. The economic cost from disasters should be weighed against the cost of inaction. The cost of inaction is data that tells you what the outcome will be if you chose to not act prior to a disaster. If a disaster were to happen in one of the most vulnerable neighborhoods right now, the lives lost, buildings damaged, and livelihoods affected would be just some of the potential costs. An ECR assessment can help identify specific areas of vulnerability, and then maps those areas to opportunities for funding and assists with incorporating ECR into the jurisdiction’s budgeting processes. 

 

Data utilization is a common thread to other ECR categories we have identified. For example, in your stakeholder engagement efforts, data can be used not only to identify ECR vulnerabilities, but it can be used to tell the story of the impacts of certain hazards or burdens on the community. It can also be a powerful tool when making difficult budget decisions about which program areas and/or neighborhoods may need to be prioritized. IBTS will have future blog posts to take a closer look at these remaining ECR categories. 

 

It is necessary to have a baseline understanding of the drivers and the conditions of vulnerability in our communities in order to effectively mitigate risks and build resilience. This begins with assessing the data, which is already available to you, what data you may still need, and how that data is being utilized and shared across community stakeholders.   

 

Exterior of the Caesars Superdome in New Orleans, Louisiana.
July 23, 2025
IBTS helps jurisdictions deliver safe, compliant stadiums on time and on budget with expert plan review, inspections, and code compliance services.
July 22, 2025
Flood risk and insurance costs are growing concerns for many municipalities — but with the right strategies, local governments can make measurable progress in protecting lives, property, and budgets. The City of Central, Louisiana, offers a strong example of how targeted actions can reduce flood risk and deliver financial benefits to residents. Through a sustained partnership with the Institute for Building Technology and Safety (IBTS), Central achieved a Class 5 rating in FEMA’s Community Rating System (CRS), resulting in a 25% discount on flood insurance premiums for all Central residents and businesses. Only two other communities in Louisiana have achieved this rating. In this blog post, Brandon Whitehead, IBTS Floodplain Manager, outlines key actions that contributed to Central’s success, including his top five recommendations for how municipalities can strengthen their own floodplain management programs and improve their CRS ratings. Background: IBTS and City of Central Partnership For more than a decade, IBTS has supported Central’s municipal operations through a nonprofit private partnership (NP3) model, using an integrated and cost-effective team to deliver complete municipal services (excluding police and fire). This long-standing relationship has provided Central with specialized expertise in planning, permitting, ordinance development, and floodplain management , while maintaining consistency across compliance and emergency preparedness efforts. Following significant damage during historic 2016 flooding, Central and IBTS have taken numerous steps to reduce vulnerability, strengthen local policy, and build long-term resilience to flood risks — all of which led to an improved CRS score. The CRS is a voluntary incentive program administered by FEMA that rewards communities for implementing floodplain management practices that exceed minimum National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) requirements. The program offers progressively greater flood insurance discounts as communities achieve better classifications, ranging from Class 9 to Class 1. As Brandon explains, “Our most recent improvement from a Class 7 to a Class 5 rating means we’re not only helping property owners save money on premiums, but also actively reducing flood risk across our community. While every community’s path will look different, there are several practical, proven steps that most municipalities can take to strengthen their CRS ratings.” Here are Brandon’s top five strategies municipalities can use to follow Central’s lead and reduce flood risk: 1. Appoint a Qualified Floodplain Manager CRS success starts with strong leadership. Central designated a floodplain coordinator with technical expertise and deep knowledge of FEMA regulations, ordinances, and compliance. Rather than tasking administrative staff with this complex role, cities like Central have brought in specialists — in this case, through IBTS — to guide CRS strategy and implementation. 2. Strengthen Local Ordinances for New Development Central updated its development codes to protect existing properties from increased runoff and flood risk. These updates include: Enhanced drainage requirements for new construction Mandatory assessments to ensure no off-site impact (upstream or downstream) Stricter elevation rules for buildings in flood-prone areas Reduced substantial damage threshold from 50% to 45% of pre-disaster market value, triggering elevation requirements for more structures These changes not only supported CRS goals but also reflected Central Mayor Wade Evans’ push for smarter development and public safety. 3. Use GIS and Modeling Tools to Map Risk With support from engineering partner CSRS, Central developed a hydraulic model to monitor drainage systems and identify high-risk areas. With these tools integrated into the City’s GIS, development applications could be evaluated for impact — enabling more informed planning decisions and protecting legacy neighborhoods. Real-time flood gauges are now being piloted to provide early warnings and improve emergency response. 4. Establish Long-Term Hazard Mitigation Plans Central worked with East Baton Rouge Parish to develop a multi-jurisdictional hazard mitigation plan , laying the foundation for infrastructure upgrades, grant funding, and coordinated response. The CRS program awards points for these collaborative efforts, which also contribute to resilience. 5. Limit Use of Enclosures Below Elevated Structures To reduce post-disaster damage and future NFIP claims, Central implemented new limits on enclosed areas under elevated homes (typically used for parking or storage). Homeowners are required to: Keep these enclosures non-residential Sign compliance agreements Undergo annual inspections This practical policy earned CRS credit and helped preserve the intent of elevation requirements. Where to Start Communities don’t need to go at it alone. IBTS partners with municipalities to provide floodplain management services, ordinance development, planning support, and CRS strategy. Whether you’re starting with a Class 9 rating or aiming for Class 1, a structured approach can produce real, measurable benefits for your community. Interested in improving your CRS rating? Contact IBTS to learn how we can support your community’s flood resilience goals.
Tiburones community members asking IBTS staff questions at an info
By Karen Johnson July 18, 2025
Discover how IBTS Puerto Rico’s strategic community engagement approach helps overcome challenges, build trust, and create resilient, locally driven solutions.